How is the BSC different than a landlord?

Landlords utilize the land and/or buildings they control to extract wealth from tenants' rents. Most landlords seek to maximize their profit.

In the Bay Area, demand for housing is extremely high. San Francisco and the East Bay have gained jobs eight times faster than housing since 2010.¹⁾ Lots of people are not only looking for a place to live, but have to compete with the interests of investors.

Investors can buy or build properties and keep them empty with the expectation they will be worth more in the future. For example, luxury condominiums may sit empty for months or years after construction before being purchased. Financiers and developers can afford to wait for someone to pay higher asking prices. Units may also be rented out for short-term stays (i.e. through Airbnb), rather than be used as permanent housing.²⁾

In 2019, a group of Black mothers and their children moved into a vacant, investor-owned house on Magnolia St. in Oakland. The home had been purchased by the real estate investment company Wedgewood Properties two years before they started squatting there, and had sat empty the entire time.

“There are four times as many empty homes in Oakland as there are homeless people,” pointed out one of the mothers, Sameerah Karim.³⁾

After a months long fight in the courts and a mass mobilization of people to defend the house, the families were evicted by a militarized deployment of the Alameda County Sheriff's Department in early 2020. (As a result of community pressure, Wedgewood sold the house to the Oakland Community Land Trust.)⁴⁾

The OCLT, which is affiliated with the City of Oakland, provides the following graph comparing the costs of maintaining a structure in the East Bay to the rapidly fluctuating speculative value of the land itself:

Thus, the price of rent is generally based on land value, not the actual costs of maintaining a building — water, electricity, maintenance, and taxes. The difference between these costs and the market rent price is landlords' profit.

In a co-operative housing structure, by contrast, rent prices are supposed to be fixed to expenses.⁵⁾

In the simplest structure, where a group of people own a house, revenues are primarily used to pay for utilities and maintenance, without the need to produce a profit. In the BSC, revenue is also used to reduce the rent of compensated managers, and pay the salaries of employees (the co-op's largest expense).⁶⁾

When the primary goal is to provide and maintain housing, rather than generate profit, the savings are supposed to be passed on to members.

Most tenants have no control over their landlords' operations. A small number of (usually non-profit) landlords have tenant advisory boards, or offer a few tenants positions on the organization's board. These are merely supplemental to the external governance imposed upon them, or serve to make it appear less exploitative.

Tenants may also unionize to gain more leverage in negotiating with the landlord for better conditions or lower rent, often by going on “rent strike” (collectively withholding their rent) until demands are met.⁷⁾

In the ideal form of co-operative housing, members “are” their own landlord.

In the BSC, this member-ownership is exercised through the election of representatives to the board of directors.⁸⁾